[BC] Dallas' 1190

[RichardBJohnson at comcast.net]

Now that's engineering! A little well-placed
technique and one doesn't need towers
anymore.

--
Cheers,
Richard B. Johnson
Read about my book
http://www.LymanSchool.org


 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Dana  Puopolo" <dpuopolo at usa.net>
> Yep.
> 
> 1500 in Detroit is the most obvious example. They used to have 12 towers and 5
> kW at night. Now they have 9 towers and 10 kW.
> 
> WNLC now has zero towers and no power day or night.
> 
> -D
> 
> ------ Original Message ------
> Received: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:16:22 PM EDT
> From: RichardBJohnson at comcast.net
> To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>Cc: 
> Subject: Re: [BC] Dallas' 1190
> 
> Yes. I've seen several "brute-force" arrays designed in the
> early days of directional antennas, redesigned using more
> modern tools. These ended up with fewer towers and
> usually broader bandwidth.
> 
> WNLC, New London Connecticut comes to mind.
> 
>