[BC] More Tower Sites on Google Maps
R A Meuser
rameuser at ieee.org
Tue Oct 30 10:44:05 CDT 2007
Not exactly - more towers mean more sets of nulls. There is a practical
limit to how much suppression over how wide an arc is possible with a
given number of towers. Good consultants don't spend their customer's
money unwisely. If they do they will not be around long.
RichardBJohnson at comcast.net wrote:
> Well, doing a pattern with 12 towers sounds to me like
> throwing a lot of hardware at a problem. True skill
> and inventiveness would have been shown by doing
> the same thing with four towers.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Richard B. Johnson
> Read about my book
> http://www.LymanSchool.org
>
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: WFIFeng at aol.com
>
>>In a message dated 10/30/2007 9:59:58 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
>>gglaenzer at hqradio.com writes:
>>
>
> y modified facility, made possible by the downgrade of WOWO.
>
>>(1190)
>>
>
> [Snipped]
>
>>What I foind interesting is that the major lobe of that 12 tower site appears
>>to be broadside from the array, with a large minor lobe coming off the
>>"bottom". It still amazes me how patterns like this can be "manufactured" with
>>such
>>precision these days. The wonders of computer technology and GOOD Consultants
>>to oversee the build and tune-up!
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list