[BC] Ownership Rules

[Broadcast List]

Yea, right.

I USED to think there was a difference to the parties (you ASSuME the  
Democrat Party will replace the 'pubbies).

The Republicans are just as willing to over spend as the Democrat  
Congresscritters, and the Democrat party is just as willing to throw  
our rights to the curb as the Republicans.

There is no longer any difference, so give that 15 month crap a pass.

Believe me, if ownership limits are not raised and the XM/Sirus  
merger is not allowed during Bush, Hillary will force it through.   
There is no difference.

On Oct 22, 2007, at 6:32 PM, broadcast-request at radiolists.net wrote:

> Message: 24
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:18:48 -0700
> From: dpuopolo at usa.net
> Subject: Re: [BC] Ownership Rules
> To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
> Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20071022141828.03e44080 at oldradio.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> It's not just the FCC-it's happening everywhere. He's just doing  
> what the big
> boys in his political party want him to do. They only have about 15  
> months
> left to rape the country before they all get tossed out on their  
> asses, so
> they want to insure thast everyone has as soft a butt as possible.
>
> -D
>
>
> ----- Original Message ------
> Received: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:37:04 PM EDT
> From: "Stevan A. White" <w5saw at pathwayz.com>
> Subject: [BC] Ownership Rules
>
> Does anyone else feel that FCC Chairman Kevin Martin is trying to lead
> us down the garden path with his proposal to allow cross ownership of
> newspaper and radio or TV within the same market?  Haven't radio  
> and TV
> stations suffered enough with the relaxed multiple ownership rules?