[BC] California Fires, How s everyone doing?
Broadcast List
Broadcast at fetrow.org
Mon Oct 22 20:08:31 CDT 2007
It won't work in my county, Loudoun County, Virginia.
My cable system was Adelphia, and they NEVER had a working EAS
system. Now that Comcast has taken over, it isn't much better. They
actually sort of accomplish RWTs, but RMTs have never worked.
Getting the FCC interested has been a non-starter. Thus, if one is
watching cable, and not one of the off-air stations, the nukes could
be inbound, and without a NOAA Weather Radio, one would never know.
--chip
On Oct 22, 2007, at 6:32 PM, broadcast-request at radiolists.net wrote:
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:49:11 -0500
> From: Mark Earle <mearle at mearle.com>
> Subject: Re: [BC] California Fires, How s everyone doing?
> To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
> Message-ID: <471D0CC7.7020103 at mearle.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Robert Meuser wrote:
>> From what one california official said in the media this morning,
>> 'nobody is listening to radio anymore' they had to send cops out with
>> bullhorns to evacuate people, the media is just not cutting it. So in
>
> Did 'they', the officials, use their EAS alerting capability? 'They'
> seem to know how to send out Amber Alerts. A properly working EAS
> alert
> would, at least, go out on every AM, FM, TV transmitter in a given
> region. It would also "crawl" on cable systems even if folks were
> watching CNN.
>
> Anyone listening anywhere would hear the alert. Anyone watching would
> see the alert.
>
> I suspect (can someone confirm yes/ no) the EAS was not used.
>
> I can't fathom that no one was listening to some radio station in a
> neighborhood - or in their vehicles. No one watching TV. That does not
> add up.
>
> Also, did they ask NOAA to initiate an alert via the VHF NOAA radio
> system?
>
> In other words, if they did do those things, I would be astounded that
> no one responded. If they did not do those things, then they got the
> response that is to be expected. The public are not mind readers!
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list