[BC] XM Appreciation Society

[Robert Meuser]

All true but then Sirius is worse technically.

R


Paul Smith W4KNX wrote:
> XM's low end audio is pretty good but high midrange to high is just not
> there.  In fact, XM needs to do some work at the DC studios as the Relay
> closure signals are coming thru my car radio receiver and that low bass
> drives me nuts on some of their talk channels.
> 
> Paul Smith
> Sarasota, FL
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
> [mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net]On Behalf Of Rich Wood
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 3:44 PM
> To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [BC] XM Appreciation Society
> 
> 
> ------ At 02:12 PM 10/22/2007, Kevin Block wrote: -------
> 
> 
>>Not to mention their low-bit audio now being passed of as "near CD
> 
> quality"...
> 
> Surely no one would make such a claim if it weren't absolutely true.
> I'm sure glad terrestrial radio doesn't do that.