[BC] Nighttime IBOC hash gets local press

[Dana Puopolo]

I do! The broadcasters want it one way when it suits them, and the opposite
way when it suits THEM!

You can't have it both ways, fellas! You can't claim that 100 watt stations on
third adjacents will KILL a local station's coverage, then put out a 500 watt
(in the case of a class B) BUZZ jammer on the FIRST adjacent, claiming that
that makes no difference!

The(ir) hypocracy is staggering!!

-D

------ Original Message ------
Received: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:21:22 AM EDT
From: "Mark Humphrey" <mark3xy at gmail.com>
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Subject: Re: [BC] Nighttime IBOC hash gets local press



I just find it strange that the big players suddenly don't care about
losing significant numbers of listeners, when less than nine years
ago, the NAB made such a big fuss about LPFM stations and the
"massive" havoc and interference they would cause.

Here's a flashback (scroll down to page 22 for some good reading):
http://www.radiodiversity.com/nablpfmdoc.pdf

Mark