[BC] AM Stereo On A Mono Radio

Paul B. Walker, Jr. walkerbroadcasting at gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 01:52:54 CDT 2007


Jerry:

IF we went AM Stereo, we would make a serious upgrade in the audio
processing. Going AM Stereo is not definate yet, but I'm researching the
possibilities and the pros/cons.

We would be going solid state.. a.) because the tube transmitter is on its
last legs (had another mini short in it 2 days ago) and b.) wed save enough
on an electricity bill to make it worth the upgrade to a Solid State TX

Paul



On 10/3/07, Jerry Mathis <thebeaver32 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't think you would sound better on a mono radio; in fact, I don't
> think
> there would be any difference, UNLESS you do an upgrade on your audio
> processing. Now on a STEREO radio, you would sound a WHOLE lot better,
> because stereo AM radios are designed with a wider bandwidth than the mono
> radios.
>
> Going to a SS transmitter would only make a difference if your tube type
> transmitter is in bad shape.
>
> You will not lose or gain any coverage by going AM Stereo.
>
> BEFORE I would invest in AM Stereo, I would look to see how the IBOC
> nighttime battle plays out. You currently have some nighttime power. If
> your
> signal will be "hashed" over, that wideband stereo receiver will do you no
> good at night.
>
> Jerry Mathis
>
>
>
>



More information about the Broadcast mailing list