[BC] IBOC "secrets" and my opinions.
WFIFeng@aol.com
WFIFeng
Sun Mar 25 16:26:27 CDT 2007
In a message dated 03/25/2007 4:21:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
padrino at telos-systems.com writes:
> Sadly, I'm disapponted in our fraternity of engineers who choose not to
> rally around new tech. If it has warts, then let's band together and make
> the lemonade. Color TV had issues when it rolled out, but those 'in the
> know' made it work. Had the internet existed when Color TV debuted, it
> would have been skinned-at-the-stake.
Hello, Frank. I admire and highly respect you and your work with audio
processing! I think we have some disagreement over "IBUZ", tho. ;)
Even if, "to-a-man" every single Engineer in the entire NA Continent were to
rally together, singing kum-ba-ya around some great campfire, praising this
system and laboring fast and furious to "make it right"... there's those pesky
Laws of Physics, again. This emporer ain't got no clothes. If lack of consumer
interest and response is mostly to blame for the death of AM Stereo, then what
chance does this monstrocity have?
I like Rich Wood's description of the FM system, "Seedy Quality". We are used
to data-reduced audio, true, but how many of those in this Forum absolutely
balk at the sound of 128Kbps audio? Despite an improved algorythm, I still
can't imagine how 96Kbps can even "touch" the audio quality of 1,411Kbps raw
audio... true "CD Quality". The AM system's 20-something Kbps doesn't even come
close to "FM Quality".
Powell pointed out the promises that were made... and not kept, which now are
not even mentioned anymore. "No interference on AM." It's downright
*laughable*. We're back to those pesky Laws of Physics, again. Promises, indeed
.
Then we have the issue of approx. 800,000,000 receivers that need to be
replaced. AM Stereo didn't mandate that you throw existing radios into the tras
h.
FM Stereo didn't, either. Color TV didn't mandate the discarding of B&W
receivers. Color was such a dramatic improvement over B&W, consumers saw genuin
e value
in the upgrade. Same with HDTV, there is enough improvement that it is seeing
success. They're still going to make converter boxes, and even subsidize them,
for those who don't want (or can't) afford the new HDTV receivers. (Which they
even have *battery portables* for, now!)
The business model of IBUZ reminds me too much of VHS vs Sony's Betamax. The
Beta system was superior. The tapes were smaller, and they recorded/played
longer. Sony held the whole thing, lock-stock-and-barrel, refusing to license
their technology to other manufacturers. The VHS system, OTOH, was licensed to
*numerous* manufacturers. The prices dropped dramatically, and the inferior
system swept the market. Beta was essentially dead, it was just clinging to lif
e
until the very bitter end. What was the difference? A few percent in price at
first, then the difference became greater. Consumers voted with their wallets,
bigtime. Superior quality meant squat, they wanted the lower prices. (Witness:
WalMart- despite controversy, their fractionally-lower prices draw consumers
like magnets!) Ibiquity has this thing totally locked-up and grossly
over-priced. I don't think the consumers are going to buy it. Literally.
Here we have a system that has absolutely no battery-portables, (and evasive
or total NON-answers from the company regarding such), *much* more expensive
radios, no compatibility with existing radios, and causes significant
interference to others on the dial... and we're supposed to be enthusiastic? AM
Stereo
and Beta failed for far lesser reasons than these! Consumers are going to vote
with their wallets, just like they've been doing all along.
Now, we also throw into the mix the up-and-coming WiFi systems,
cell-phone-based systems, and iPods. They're growing at a phenominal rate. They
're
relatively inexpensive and they are available in quite a few places, and growin
g
rapidly. IBUZ is too little, too late to even have a chance of competing.
Willie...
**************************************
AOL now offers free email to everyone.
Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list