[BC] Skywave dying
r j carpenter
rcarpen1
Thu Mar 22 21:31:20 CDT 2007
> From: Mike McCarthy <Towers at mre.com>
> The sunset date for NTSC was done to facilitate the migration to more
> spectrally efficient digital modes. Aural broadcasting doesn't gain
> anything, and in fact is worse spectrally because of adjacent channel
> occupancy which will impact/interact with analog operations of distant
> stations on AM. The problem isn't that bad on FM unless there is a
> substantial 2nd adjacent short spacing which most urban Class A stations
> possess.
You forget that here is the East there are a number of FM "Class B"
FIRST adjacents in nearby cities. I use quotes since some have rather
severe DAs. Some examples are:
WHFS 105.7 Catonsville, MD (Baltimore)
WJZW 105.9 Woodbridge, VA (xmtr at Washington Beltway and US29)
48 miles
WHFS 105.7 to WQXA 105.7 York, PA
47 miles (cochannel, both Class B with severe DA)
WMMX 106.5 Baltimore
WJFK 106.7 Manassas, VA (xmtr at Washington Beltway and US29)
44 miles
WFSI 107.9 Annapolis
WTWP 107.7 Warrenton, VA
66 miles
WFSI 107.9 Annapolis
WGTY 107.7 Gettysburg, PA
62 miles
WTOP 103.5 Washington
WXCY 103.7 Havre de Graqce, MD
68 miles
There are so many close second-adjacents that they are not worth listing.
bob carpenter
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list