[BC] New PSRA/PSSA nightmare!!

[Bailey, Scott]

The buyer in reality is Citadel.  They own 2 FM stations in this market,
including one the is licensed to Gallatin (WGFX),but acts as a Nashville
station.

-----Original Message-----
From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Robert Meuser
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 9:23 AM
To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
Subject: Re: [BC] New PSRA/PSSA nightmare!!

You are in fact almost correct. The buyer is Radio Disney. Remember the 
ABC stations were recently sold. The application is dated Jan 29th 2007 
and is not yet granted. I still don't see Radio Disney signing off on 
interference for nothing is return. It compromises their pattern in all 
directions and sets a precedent. Slowly as other stations take advantage

of that precedent, the RSS just creeps up and up and up.

R


Bailey, Scott wrote:

>Robert,
>  I was told that the NY Times has filed a application to transfer WQEW
>to ABC.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
>[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Robert Meuser
>Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 8:19 AM
>To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [BC] New PSRA/PSSA nightmare!!
>
>WQEW is owned by the NY Times and LMA'd to ABC. I don't see them or any

>other A signing off on interference unless they get something in
return.
>
>R
>
>
>Bailey, Scott wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I calling my lawyer today and we are going to battle on this. I
protect
>>WQEW, now owned by ABC.  I'm a former ABC Radio employee. I going to
>>    
>>
>hop
>  
>
>>on the horn today and get something done about this. Who in the hell
is
>>listening to all that damn Disney hip-hop on WQEW at 7 am eastern, 6
>>    
>>
>am,
>  
>
>>my time (central)?
>>
>>Scott
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
>>[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Alan Alsobrook
>>Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:16 AM
>>To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
>>Subject: Re: [BC] New PSRA/PSSA nightmare!!
>>
>>Some very interesting reading for sure.. I see one of my stations that

>>is Licensed for 334 Watts Nightime now has a PSRA for 14 watts.. Very 
>>interesting indeed..
>>
>>Note if you read down in 73.99 for those that got really low powers,
>>    
>>
>10W
>  
>
>>is the lower limit for presunrise. 50W is the lower level until 1800 
>>local time on postsunset.
>>
>>Also something that would make an interesting case is that as coded in
>>
>>73.99(c)(2) The Commission will issue appropriate authorizations to 
>>Class D stations not previously eligible to operate during this
period.
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>> Class D stations authorized to operate during this pre-sunrise period
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>may continue to operate under their current authorization.
>>
>>Which basically meant if you had a 500W PSRA and you received a new 22

>>watt one, you could keep using the older 500W one (as long as you
>>    
>>
>didn't
>  
>
>>loose that piece of paper) But then again when you look at 73.99(i) & 
>>73.99(j) you see..
>>
>>(i)  The PSRA or PSSA is secondary to the basic instrument of 
>>authorization with which it is to be associated.  The PSRA or PSSA may

>>be suspended, modified, or withdrawn by the FCC without prior notice
or
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>right to hearing, if necessary to resolve interference conflicts, to 
>>implement agreements with foreign governments, or in other
>>    
>>
>circumstances
>  
>
>>warranting such action.  Moreover, the PSRA or PSSA does not extend 
>>beyond the term of the basic authorization.
>>(j)  The Commission will periodically recalculate maximum permissible 
>>power and times for commencing PSRA and PSSA for each Class D station 
>>operating in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.  The 
>>Commission will calculate the maximum power at which each individual 
>>station may conduct presunrise operations during extended daylight 
>>saving time and shall issue conforming authorizations.  These original

>>notifications and subsequent notifications should be associated with
>>    
>>
>the
>  
>
>>station's authorization.  Upon notification of new power and time of 
>>commencing operation, affected stations shall make necessary
>>    
>>
>adjustments
>  
>
>>within 30 days.
>>
>>Ahh the lawyers will be able to make a gob of money off of this!
>>
>>WFIFeng at aol.com wrote:
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>In a message dated 03/01/2007 2:41:10 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>sbailey at nespower.com writes:
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Well, this is what Willie has been waiting for. I'm going to go look
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>at
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>mine and his.
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Oh, no! No! NO!!! <:O
>>>
>>>This is *Horrible*!! 
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
>Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More!

>www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
>Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More!

>www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________

The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More! 
www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com