[BC] Station Rules compliance (AOL Webmail)
Robert Meuser
Robertm
Tue Feb 27 09:50:02 CST 2007
Scott:
That is too lax of an attitude. If someone interfered inside a 5 mv/m
contour I was responsible for I would first file the appropriate valid
complaint, if that failed the towers would be on the ground.
R
Bailey, Scott wrote:
>Oh by the way Kent, every morning for the first two to three hours after
>sunrise, my station gets stomped on by WPAD, WPGY, WAGL and WBOL, all on
>1560.
>
>I've come to the realization that this is going to happen and it's there
>for good. I've got WPAD right in the middle of the day causing some
>interference to my 5 m/vM. No use to grip about it, I just live with
>it. I do believe their day pattern is somewhat out of wack, but so what.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
>[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Kent Winrich
>Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 9:18 AM
>To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [BC] Station Rules compliance (AOL Webmail)
>
>OK enough Scott! BS! I used to work for Clear Channel and sticking to
>the
>rules was JOB ONE. There is no IF ANDS OR BUTS about it. You didnt
>stick
>to the rules you were GONE. The engineer that told you that is WAY out
>of
>line.
>
>So stop this whining, pull your head out of the sand, oh and stop your
>whining.
>
>And hats off to Gary. He nailed it. I truly feel sorry for you that
>have
>such a negative outlook. Radio has it problems, but what business
>doesnt.
>
>Count me in for the self policing technique.
>
>Kent Winrich
>
>
>
>On 2/27/07, Bailey, Scott <sbailey at nespower.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Clear Channel owns a daytimer on 780 in Cookeville, TN. They sign off
>>at night to protect WBBM, which is owned by CBS. If I was a betting
>>
>>
>man,
>
>
>>if Clear Channel owned WBBM, you would see the daytimer on 780 in
>>Cookeville, TN stay on 24/7. One of their own engineers told me that.
>>
>>Scott
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
>>[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Jerry Mathis
>>Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 4:37 PM
>>To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
>>Subject: Re: [BC] Station Rules compliance (AOL Webmail)
>>
>>Personally, I have no plans to become the radio police. As I work for
>>Clear
>>Channel, if I had information about another station operating
>>
>>
>illegally,
>
>
>>I
>>would contact my RVPE before anyone else. If my employment situation
>>
>>
>was
>
>
>>different, then I would look at protecting whatever radio station(s) I
>>worked for. My point was not to become the "Radio Nazi's", but to work
>>positively to prevent illegal operation, and help keep the band clean.
>>Yes,
>>I might even agree to work with a station that needs help to overcome
>>illegal operation, assuming they ask me, and are desiring to comply.
>>
>>
>But
>
>
>>I
>>would not work for a station that deliberately operates illegally.
>>
>>
>Well,
>
>
>>maybe only if I were starving otherwise :) but I would sure take
>>
>>
>steps
>
>
>>to
>>CMA.
>>
>>JM
>>
>>
>>On 2/26/07, Robert Meuser <Robertm at broadcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Jerry:
>>>
>>>You are correct but I don't think that your employer would
>>>
>>>
>appreciate
>
>
>>it
>>
>>
>>>if you appointed yourself to be the radio police.
>>>It could negatively impact some other aspect of their business plans
>>>
>>>
>>you
>>
>>
>>>are not aware of.
>>>
>>>R
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
>>Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and
>>
>>
>More!
>
>
>>www.SystemsStore.com Tel: 407-656-3719 Sales at SystemsStore.com
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
>>Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and
>>
>>
>More!
>
>
>>www.SystemsStore.com Tel: 407-656-3719 Sales at SystemsStore.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list