[BC] FM Stereo invention
DHultsman5@aol.com
DHultsman5
Sat Feb 24 10:15:22 CST 2007
In a message dated 2/19/2007 2:15:14 PM Central Standard Time,
Robertm at broadcast.net writes:
> the
>deficiency of the switching menthod becomes immediately apparent when there
is a
>large difference between the channels, such as one channel being silent.
The
>audio is chopped on/off at 38Khz, at nearly a 50% duty cycle. (Perfect
switches
>would make it 50%) That's gotta add distortion along the way. Someone else
>mentioned the harmonics, which can intermod with subcarriers (if present)
or do
>other nasty IMD tricks.
>
>While the switching method may be *effective*, I don't think it's the best
>way. Someone else pointed out the decoder flaws, and again, those are good
>points... and may, in reality, negate the effects of the "cheaper"
switching method.
>
>Willie...
>
********************************************************
Some of the best specifications on stereo generators were the Rood and other
Matrix type stereo generators from Europe and Australia.
Dave
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free
email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
http://www.aol.com.
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list