[BC] FM Stereo Matrix & TDM
DHultsman5@aol.com
DHultsman5
Sat Feb 24 10:13:31 CST 2007
In a message dated 2/19/2007 2:15:14 PM Central Standard Time,
Robertm at broadcast.net writes:
At the end of the day i think once a filter is designed, the
switching approach would be better. We are really having a historical
discussion as the switching method was greatly improved by several
developers and the matrix when done completely in the digital domain can
be virtually perfect.
R
*****************************************************
Robert is correct, as usual.
TDM type stereo generators early on offered advantages both a tube-type and
solid-state stereo generators. Most of the early martix type atereo
generators were tube type. In an audio matrix L+R / L-R system, the amplititude and
phase changes can have severe effects on the performance of the stereo
generator. Later model transistorized "Matrix type" stereo generators had
separation similiar to the the TDM type. I believe the Gates TE-1 stereo generator
was a solid state "matrix type".
Incidently, I heard from one of my early mentors in the FM stereo business,
that the reason the 29.7 dB. figure was used for an FM stereo specification,
was that it was about as good as you could measure graphically using the
gratical on the oscilloscope. This was well before there were monitors
available.
>From experience with and without a stereo monitor, It was difficult to
meet the separation specification using a major manufacturer's tube type matrix
stereo generator 50 Hz. - 15 kHz.. Another station in town with a
tube-type TDM stereo generator was nearly 40 dB without any adjustments.
Dave
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free
email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
http://www.aol.com.
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list