[BC] Why an older transmitter may be a good choice

Bailey, Scott sbailey
Thu Feb 22 15:41:05 CST 2007


Rob,
  Check out this web page:

http://www.energy-onix.com/HTML/Catalog%20Sheets/Pulsar%20250%20500%20B.
html

That is the Pulsar 250B or 500B

The 250B is a perfect stand by, if one feels compelled to have a stand
by transmitter. I'm not a big Energy Onix fan, but that's a good choice.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Rob Atkinson
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 11:34 AM
To: broadcast at radiolists.net
Subject: RE: [BC] Why an older transmitter may be a good choice

Oh my gosh is that all they cost?  I was wondering...but had guessed a
250 
w. s.s. AM tx would run  $10K to $15K.  $3500 is less than some ham
rigs.  
On the other hand, there were months at the 3kw erp FM I once worked at
when 
we could barely pay the light bill.

rob atkinson



More information about the Broadcast mailing list