[BC] Re: HD Receiver flaws

[Rich Wood]

------ At 12:27 PM 2/20/2007, Kent Winrich wrote: -------

>Grow up Rich.
>
>If you dont like the data I present then JUST SHUT THE HELL UP.

This is an impressively adult response. When Barry gives me that 
directive I'll go away. He, not you, is the Moderator.

>Why cant we have a discussion without you showing your face here?  Why
>is it that you must chime into every single HD Radio discussion?  And
>when you do chime in it is usually a worthless piece of infomation
>that does nothing for the discussion.

Maybe it's because someone has to counter the puffery. I've shown my 
face here going back to the Fidonet days. You're the new kid on the 
block. If my "Where in the World is Carmen IBUZ" data is worthless 
use your delete key. The last time I looked the Northeast was one of 
the country's major population centers. What happens here is likely 
to represent what happens in other areas. It's also very congested 
and any flaw in the technology is going to show up here. Almost every 
tiny town has a radio station.

In addition, most who post about the technology and the receivers 
seem to experience the same things I do. Not many report the awesome 
reception you do.

>Seriously, is someone paying you to do this?  Or you that seriously
>obsessed that you have such a need to have the last word on
>everything.

Clients do pay me to pay attention to the technology and publications 
pay me when I write for them.

>I present this information only for the professional discussion of the
>technology.  I have no financial gains from HD Radio, nor do I work
>for any company that promotes HD Radio or even works with HD Radio.  I
>have installed AM and FM HD systems, and presently have two HD
>receivers that I enjoy.

If I could figure out how to explain why someone should buy one my 
receiver would probably be on Ebay. The promises aren't being fulfilled.

Rich