[BC] Re:50 Kw AM and 1 5/8 line
Xmitters@aol.com
Xmitters
Tue Feb 20 10:11:36 CST 2007
In a message dated 2/20/07 12:00:42 AM Central Standard Time,
broadcast-request at radiolists.net writes:
<< On Monday 19 February 2007, Xmitters at aol.com wrote:
>> You have to remember that the 250 kW peak power that you mentioned is peak
>> Envelope Power, which is defined as the equivalent unmodulated power that
>> has the same voltage as the amplitude modulated carrier at peak crest of
>> modulation.
<But of course. Basic stuff.>
Indeed it is. I have met people that believe that peak power and peak
envelope power is the same thing. Basic yes. A misunderstanding can be costly.
>> Even at this [506kW]
>> figure, we have not considered the required headroom for possible VSWR
>> excursions for this system yet. All of the 50 kW AMs that I have
>> seen/worked on, either use three inch rigid coax or four inch andrew air
>> dielectric.
>Certainly one needs to think about the VSWR as well. But have you tried
>1-5/8's at 50kW to see what it would do?
Nope, no need to. I already know the line's ratings will be exceeded at 125%
positive crest modulation. None of my employers ever had the funding for
experiments designed to verify what theory clearly demonstrates; I go by what the
manufacturer says and don't push that envelope (no pun intended). In an
emergency, I would do anything. I would however, tend to run with less carrier and
more modulation if I had an emergency line that could not handle full power.
> Anyone here using 1 5/8 foam feedline for their 50 kW AM plant ? If so, you
> have more guts than I have.
I know of a 25KW using 1-5/8's. And for that application it is sufficient.
>>
I'm sure it would work well in such an application.
Jeff Glass
Northern Illinois University
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list