[BC] Re: HD Receiver

Robert Meuser Robertm
Thu Feb 15 05:56:40 CST 2007


Dana

You Rich and many of us are just wrong.  Kent has been thoroughly 
indoctrinated  and can not possibly be wrong. How can we know? He 
repeats what was told to him. How dare we contradict him! King Kent is 
the ultimate authority based on the one or two seminars he attended. 
Please do not introduce free thinking or any actual knowledge here. It 
is not allowed in Kent's world. Heil King Kent.

R


Dana Puopolo wrote:

>Let's get real....
>
>HD radio simply isn't flying off the shelves. It isn't even CRAWLING off the
>shelves!
>
>To me at least Christmas 2007 won't be HD's year either. HDTV and Internet
>radio look to be the big winners there. I predict a PORTABLE (FM Walkman size)
>Inyernet radio this Crristmas for well under 100 dollars. HD can't get smaller
>then tabletop size.
>
>The two year window for HD's success is getting shorter by the day. NOTHING I
>see or hear out there is going to help HD sales. 
>
>-D
>
>
>
>------ Original Message ------
>Received: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:29:44 AM EST
>From: "Kent Winrich" <kwinrich at gmail.com>
>To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
>Subject: Re: [BC] Re: HD Receiver
>
>On 2/14/07, Rich Wood <richwood at pobox.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>------ At 06:30 PM 2/14/2007, Kent Winrich wrote: -------
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Well since Rich is a stikler for keeping information correct, you can get
>>>this receiver for $1700.  You may want to look at this review:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>http://www.audioholics.com/productreviews/avhardware/YamahaRX-V4600HTp1.php
>>    
>>
>>>The real good thing is that it has HDMI switching.
>>>      
>>>
>>I'm sure it'll be exciting reading. However, it isn't the model I was
>>referring to. That means my original comment was correct. There's no
>>HDTV switching on the model I had access to. I haven't been able to
>>hear this new unit. No one here stocks it. The earlier model had only
>>component, composite and s-video switching, according to its manual.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Rich you should expand your horizons beyond you little world.  Seriously,
>>>you consult with such a closed mind?
>>>      
>>>
>>You have no idea how I consult.  Perhaps your boy wonder protege
>>does. You should also understand that even cheerleaders can have
>>closed minds when they refuse to admit there are severe deficiencies
>>in the technology and marketing of their beloved cheerleading target.
>>
>>I guess you're right about my little world. It begins in Boston and
>>ends in Los Angeles. It doesn't yet include Hawaii. I realize it's
>>nowhere near as grand as your International horizons. I'll just have
>>to be happy with my little world.
>>
>>Rich
>>    
>>
>
>
>I dont argue that you have been actross this country and into Mexico, but
>when you use one point of data....
>
>For example, you critisize all of HD2 based on one instance on your local
>station.  (dont get me wrong, it is an issue for SOME stations, but you dont
>seem to realize what has been done at some facilities).
>
>Another, you base your HD receiver sales on the Boston/Springfield area;
>talking to one shop about single receiver.
>
>That just doesnt seem like a good enough source of data.  Unless you are
>holding other data from us.
>  
>



More information about the Broadcast mailing list