[BC] AM RF challenges
DHultsman5@aol.com
DHultsman5
Thu Apr 26 10:51:01 CDT 2007
In a message dated 4/26/2007 10:31:45 AM Central Daylight Time,
RichardBJohnson at comcast.net writes:
Some directional antenna systems needed to use a built-in resistor
for attenuation to control field intensity in the days when
transmitters were required to operate at their rated power. Now they
use trees.
--
Cheers,
Richard B. Johnson
*****************************
Now they use trees, changes in conductivity, lossy front ends on
receivers, interfering noises from power lines, outlighting
ballasts, floursecent light, neon light, zeon lights, halon lights,
computer microprocessors, cellular telephones interfing with
windshield antennas in the AM band. Eveyuthing has changes on the
receive side. The only things that have changed on the transmitt
side, not required fixed input power using RF resistors in common
points, any power on any channel that the channel will accept
excluding the old Class IV locals, PSSA and PSA authorities. A few
changes in 87 years of AM broadcasting. AH digital or not to
digital, that is the question?
Dave
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list