[BC] Re: Copper program Loops
Xmitters@aol.com
Xmitters
Fri Apr 6 13:05:21 CDT 2007
In a message dated 4/6/07 11:39:29 AM Central Daylight Time,
broadcast-request at radiolists.net writes:
<< From: Mike McCarthy
Subject: Re: [BC] Copper program loops
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List"
Message-ID: <5.0.0.25.2.20070406090718.02d0fc08 at pop.ais.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Jeff,
How long is the circuit? If its less than 5000 ft. of wire feet, then a
pair of 111C's back to back in 150 ohm configuration should work
fine. Otherwise, the associated equalizers will be needed. Both can be
had surplus. E-bay regularly has them for $50 ea.
I have in the past used a graphic equalizer to smooth out the curve if it
was possible. But depending on the amount of correction needed, that would
be a worse off selection.
Also, you could also run a DC closure on the pair by inserting a good sized
cap between the coils at the center and injecting 12-48VDC on the pair.
I have an equalizer and 111C if you want to try that route out before
committing.
MM
>>
Mike:
The split coil and big honking capacitor is "out" for the contact closures.
That works fine for Two Way but that big cap and the inductance of the split
repeat coil winding produces a nice notch filter at some audio frequency. Hum
can also be an issue. No thank you. We will use a separate loop for signaling.
It is a little over 5000 feet of wire. NIU does not have a purchasing
protocol for buying things on Ebay. yes, the 111C is a great solution, even tho
ugh it
goes back to the days when dirt was new. NIU frowns on buying used things
because there is no warranty recourse, among many other objections.
I was really hoping for, and prefer, an inexpensive 21st century solution for
this project. I don't want any unlicensed radio solutions. I would prefer an
economy T1 encoder-decoder for copper or fiber. There is another dish on
campus that I can have, and there's fiber from there to here.
I cannot afford 25 grand for a high end T1 for a backup. It would therefore
appear from your posts and those of others, that the 111C or Jensen
transformers are the best choices. Anyone disagree? At my age, I'm a bit parano
id about
resorting to "old fart engineering" by using things that were popular 20 years
ago. But if that's the best approach, then why not? I just want to be sure
that it is :-)
Thanks,
Jeff Glass, BSEE CSRE
Chief Engineer
WNIU WNIJ
Northern Illinois University
DEC 6180 Win NT 4.0 SP6A AOL 5.0
**************************************
See
what's free at http://www.aol.com.
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list