[BC] Pushing too hard

[Steve]

Well, for time economy (and the fact that I'm a newcomer to this forum) you
can skip reading my post. To you it would be a re-hash. I'm posting this so
you don't have to drag yourself through yet another message that you've seen
a million times. I haven't seen all the posts you've seen and that's why
I've asked. Email lists are like radio/tv stations who want good ratings.
Cume is here to stay. Sampling in one thing we want. I just happen to be one
of the new viewers. (samplers)

BTW, the preceding was not a flippant remark.

Regards,
Steve
Steve Walker Productions

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Alexander" <dynotherm at earthlink.net>
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [BC] Pushing too hard


> On 22 Jan 2006 at 8:20, Bill Harms wrote:
>
> > What is the imperative of seeing full digital broadcasting?
>
> Most problems of IBOC, with the exception of the codecs which
> will improve over time, relate to two things. Power and
> adjacency. Elimination of analog solves both.
>
> The number of times we have discussed the advantages on this
> and other lists makes revisiting that topic pointless. The
> world has advanced during the past century technologically.
> It is past time for broadcasting to catch up.
>
>
> Phil Alexander, CSRE, AMD
> Broadcast Engineering Services and Technology
> (a Div. of Advanced Parts Corporation)
> Ph. (317) 335-2065   FAX (317) 335-9037
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/236 - Release Date: 1/20/06
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
http://www.radiolists.net/