[BC] Documented harmful interference

[Kent Winrich, K9EZ]

Fine I guess I have been out voted.

If you folks consider Jabba The HD, IBUZ, et al to be a quality 
discussion about how we can improve the situation, then I have not much 
else to say.

Guess I wont be spending as much time here and will spend more time on 
the BE reflector.

All I was trying to do folks is to generate quality discussion on 
improvements.  But if you all want to rant ant rave how terrible it is, 
be my guest.  Where will it get you in the long run?

There is nothing really to learn here...... and that is why I was a part 
of this.

Dave Dunsmoor wrote:

>>I won't lose any sleep but I'll miss you. Fire up the filter. If the
>>rest of the list would like me to go, just let me know and I'll
>>    
>>
>unsubscribe.
>  
>
>>Rich
>>    
>>
>
>
>    You stay put. I don't  always agree with everything you say or how you
>say it, but in my view, yours is the voice of reason regarding IBOC and it's
>negative effects on AM radio. I personally have heard very little IBOC, but
>what I've heard I don't like. The infatuation that the powers that be seem
>to have with "all things digital" has severely clouded their judgment. Had
>they done this IBOC correctly, I'd be all over it, and would have bought one
>(or more) of the receivers already. As it is, when my MANY analog radios in
>the house, car and office go silent, (or buzzy, whichever the case may be),
>I'll find something else to listen to, and as others have said, there are
>MANY alternate options.
>
>    We just bought our son an IPOD for his birthday. What a neat gadget. I
>would have never looked at one before, but I do see it's attraction for the
>younger folks, and they're all over the place now. Shortwave radio will
>certainly increase it's presence in my listening. I currently listen to AM
>while on the road (40 - 50 k miles/year), FM in the office, and AM/shortwave
>at home and in the shop.
>
>    But IBOC will not likely ever sell ads to my household. I won't pay $$$
>for radio that doesn't provide me with something interesting/useful. If the
>next car I buy has it installed, so be it, but not being able to listen to a
>specific station a long way off for the content I want to hear as I drive
>around the country will just cause me to eliminate AM from my selection
>list. Currently, and in the past, AM radio has made $$$ by me buying based
>on their ads. Won't likely happen in the future.
>
>    Just my humble opinions....take them or leave them as you see fit.
>
>Dave Dunsmoor
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>  
>