[BC] HD/2 (was: [Fwd: HD2])

[DANA PUOPOLO]

Look, if you all believe that 48K digital stereo is 'progress' - and a radio
system you can happily live with for the next 30-40 years, then more power to
you!

I simply believe that we deserve better - that's all!

-D



------ Original Message ------
Received: 
From: "Kent Winrich, K9EZ" <kwinrich at gmail.com>
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Subject: Re: [BC] HD/2 (was: [Fwd: HD2])

Fr the 24 year old women I have played it for they agree with Bob.

DANA PUOPOLO wrote:

>That's fine for you Bob - and you're a 60ish man.
>
>Will a 20ish woman (with much better HF hearing then all of us) feel the
same
>way you do?
>
>THAT's the question we need to answer!
>
>-D
> 
>
>
>
>Although 48 kbps HDC is not "CD-quality" by any stretch of the imagination, 
>I don't find that the compression artifacts prevent me from enjoying the 
>programming. And that is the bottom line.
>
>Bob Orban 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>  
>


_______________________________________________
This is the BROADCAST mailing list
To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
http://www.radiolists.net/