[BC] AM digital in Boston

[Mike McCarthy]

But it might just take a few of those well publicized battered and bruising 
bashes with/between some big guns and their foolhardy managers to drive the 
point home that this is really bad for the whole medium.  They may think 
they have the upper hand right now.  But when the shoe is on the other 
foot, those managers who signed up for this will realize just how bad they 
too will suffer from surrounding station(S!!!) lighting up...on <their> channel

MM

At 08:16 AM 1/19/2006 -0700, Cowboy wrote
>On Wednesday 18 January 2006 08:43 pm, DANA PUOPOLO wrote:
>
> >Can anyone explain to me why this scenario is a good thing for radio in
> >general and AM radio in particular??
>
>  I don't know anyone who would say that the scenario you describe is
>  good for radio, or anything else for that matter, OTHER than that it
>  provides the opportunity for the licensees involved to respond
>  in the right way.
>
>  It's my considered opinion that "fighting back" at another station to
>  give them a "taste of their own medicine" is not at all the "right" way.
>  That's just very expensive mutual assured destruction,
>  and few ( if any ) of us want that !
>
>--
>Cowboy
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
>http://www.radiolists.net/