[BC] Re: A different tack ....

[Mike McCarthy]

It's one thing to tinker with something to make better in a controlled 
(lab) environment.  That's the corollary to the Wright Bros. and most any 
inventor. The boondoggle with IBOC is they KNEW that the system created 
harmful interference and yet proceeded to market the system 
anyway.  Clearly not ready for prime-time on the AM side.

Ibiquity should have followed Orison Well's advice from the old Gallo wine 
commercials..."We shall sell no wine before it's time."

MM

At 05:53 AM 1/19/2006 -0600, Kent Winrich, K9EZ wrote

>EXACTLY Cowboy!  I ma here to learn!  There are certainly much smarter 
>people than me that I can learn from.
>The only way I see it is that if we dont "get our hands dirty" by giving 
>it a try and then making suggestions for improvement, we get no where.
>The only other options I have seen so far are A) turn it off B) go to 
>another band.
>
>Turn it off does nothing really, except delay the inevitable.  Go to 
>another band might be interesting, but would we have to deal with worse 
>coverage (if it was to go to a higher frequency), or is a band even available?
>
>Again, we can Nay Say, or we can offer CONCRETE ideas of improvement.
>I must say that that I certainly dont feel connected to iBiqity.  I think 
>that their  lack of communications to the engineering community is 
>certainly a pitfall.  If I were them I would be all over the place.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
>http://www.radiolists.net/