[BC] What is coming?
Robert Meuser
Robertm
Wed Jan 18 00:56:24 CST 2006
We've been down this road before. You are the programmer, think way outside the
box and forget arbitron. I am not giving anything away for free.
R
richwood at pobox.com wrote:
> ------ At 10:38 PM 1/15/2006, Robert Meuser wrote: -------
>
>> Programming - just stop thinking like Rich and you will be starting
>> down the right path.
>
>
> Robert,
> That's a recurring cheap shot. Other than store and forward like the
> SIRIUS Replay, TIVO and iPod there isn't much beyond a linear approach
> to radio. You repeatedly ridicule me without presenting any options.
> They're all secret.
>
> OK. Everyone in radio stop thinking linearly. The fact that there won't
> be any way to implement whatever wondrous on demand capabilities for
> decades to come shouldn't matter. Of course, you've repeatedly said
> radio is dead, even with the awesome IBUZ technology, so I have to
> assume we're talking apples and oranges. Please give us a hint how
> individual broadcasters can do more than linear programming.
>
> If you're talking about non-broadcast technologies, that's a whole
> different matter. If it's broadcast, you're going to have to start
> bashing the receiver manufacturers, too. They won't make any changes in
> IBUZ receivers of any significance until they see some movement in
> sales. If I got so much resistance to changing the layered display I can
> only imagine how your secret sauces are going to be received.
>
> Since such things as MediaFLO and other cellular/WiFi technologies are
> starting from scratch you can let your imagination run wild. Compare the
> NAB with the CES. Almost the only constraints on those technologies will
> be how to bill for them and where to locate new towers. I'm assuming
> that companies like Qualcomm are just chomping at the bit to serve every
> tiny town in the nation. We all know there are no cellular dead spots
> anywhere in the nation.
>
> Just give us a hint, oh Mighty One. With the technology broadcasters
> will have for the next 20 years, how should we think?
>
> Rich Wood
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list