[BC] Losing High End In Mono...
Robert Meuser
Robertm
Wed Jan 18 00:46:59 CST 2006
no some time it is by design as in a low pass filter.
R
Burt I. Weiner wrote:
> I would agree with all of these except the loss of high end. To me, loss
> of high end in mono generally indicates phase issues, a problem which
> has been mostly ignored or forgotten about since audio proofs are no
> longer required.
>
> Burt
>
> At 12:16 PM 1/16/2006, you wrote:
>
>> From: Goran Tomas <goran.tomas at email.htnet.hr>
>> Subject: Re: [BC] Mono Expands on the FM Band
>> To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
>> Message-ID: <7.0.0.16.2.20060116202135.036b1438 at email.htnet.hr>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>>
>> --- At 16.1.2006 10:00, Barry Mishkind wrote: ---
>> > If your format is, for example, the 60s oldies,
>> > most were in mono. Most listeners remember
>> > them from AM.
>>
>> OK, yes. Never generalize ;-) Something like 60s oldies would be fine
>> in mono. Music from the 80s onwards however, looses depth, airiness
>> and high-end when switched to mono...
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Goran Tomas
>
>
> Burt I. Weiner Associates
> Broadcast Technical Services
> Glendale, California U.S.A.
> biwa at earthlink.net
> K6OQK
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list