[BC] External combustion
Phil Alexander
dynotherm
Tue Jan 17 09:14:56 CST 2006
On 16 Jan 2006 at 19:35, Ron Youvan wrote:
> >>Yet today, I see no advocates for the tried and true
> >>external combustion steam engines !
>
> > There are a lot of them in use at sea in ships and they are used in nuclear
> > power plants and many conventional fired electrical power plants. I advocate
> > them under certain conditions.
>
> (I can't figure out what thread the comment above came from.)
> Locomotive engines had a power efficiency of 12%, with steam condensers 18%.
> Diesel engines 35%, that is why the steam locomotives are now Toyotas and Nissans
> and CAT power goes into ships.
A modern fossil fuel steam generating station will
have an efficiency upward of 40%. Same is true for
a large ship under steam power. Superheated steam,
high pressure boilers with economizers and vacuum
condensers do improve the Rankine cycle just a tad.
Phil Alexander, CSRE, AMD
Broadcast Engineering Services and Technology
(a Div. of Advanced Parts Corporation)
Ph. (317) 335-2065 FAX (317) 335-9037
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date: 1/16/06
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list