[BC] Yes or no to digital

[Cowboy]

On Sunday 15 January 2006 04:31 pm, WFIFeng at aol.com wrote:
 >In a message dated 01/15/2006 12:04:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 >curt at spam-o-matic.net writes:
 >
 >>  While you have raised some valid points, I do think that the pronouncement
 >>   of the death of technology is a bit premature.
 >
 >I am totally in agreement with Rich about IBUZ, and I don't think he is
 >saying that digital technology is dead... and I certainly don't 
think so, either.

  Obviously, that was misunderstood, as it was not meant to imply that Rich
  is making such a pronouncement, but others certainly are.

 >Since I cannot speak for him, I will simply say that I have no problem with
 >*Digital Technology*, in fact, I embrace it...  I have a *big* 
problem with this
 >particular implementation, though, especially on AM.

  This seems to be the consensus.

 >I think the moniker
 >"IBUZ" fits it to a "T".

  I don't !
  It's much more an I-HISS than an IBUZ, but that's really not important.

 >It trashes two stations for each *one* that it assists.
 >How is that "helpful"?

  Currently, and under some conditions, yes.

 >Death to IBUZ, yes. Death to Digital? No way.

  Well, ya gotta start somewhere !

-- 
Cowboy