[BC] A bit disappointed.

Robert Meuser Robertm
Sun Jan 15 22:10:33 CST 2006


Willie

you could do this with no DIGITAL interference to the first adjacent and run 
anywhere from 5 to 10 kHz audio in analog. If you ran more than 5kHz you would 
still interfere with the first adjacent on that side of the carrier just as is 
the case today with pure NRSC analog stations.

R

WFIFeng at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 01/15/2006 10:39:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Robertm at broadcast.net writes:
> 
> 
>>No in hybrid mode. All digital could do more.
> 
> 
> Without ANY interference to 1'st adj? I can't see how. Even if the station 
> squashed it's own audio to 5Khz, then ran 4 Khz of "hash" (5.1-9khz from 
> carrier) it would *still* interfere with the 1'st adjacents.
> 
> The only way it could *not* interfere would be to see all AM's limit their 
> analog to something like 3Khz, then run the hash between 3.1 and 4.9. That would 
> be about the only way I can imagine a hybrid mode could exist that causes no 
> interference *on special radios*. While many AM radios do roll off at 3Khz, 
> they aren't brickwall filtered there.
> 
> 
> 
>> Programming - just stop thinking like Rich and you will be starting down 
> 
> the 
> 
>> right path.
> 
> 
> Boy... now you're *really* lost me! ;) Rich has been very successful for a 
> long time. Radio has been programmed with all kinds of different formats for a 
> long time. I cannot even begin to fathom what you're talking about, here.
> 
> 
>> Shannon will allow you to go only so far and at MW freqs we are probably 
>>pushing the limit.
> 
> 
> Shannon??
> 
> Willie...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: http://www.radiolists.net/
> 


More information about the Broadcast mailing list