[BC] Stern's new gig

[Rich Wood]

------ At 07:56 AM 1/12/2006, WFIFeng at aol.com wrote: -------

>My protest is limited to never ordering a subscription to Sirius. That's
>sufficient for me. I'm also realistic enough to know that they're 
>not going to
>miss my $13 a month, either. The suggestion I would make to anyone 
>who dislikes
>that kind of programming, would be to cancel their Sirius subscriptions. If
>they don't have a sub, then be glad and move on.

It amazes me that you'd let a single channel rob you of the pleasure 
(oops, pleasure is sinful, sorry) of the classical, jazz, gospel and 
other channels simply because there's one you don't like. I don't 
suppose you have cable because there's a Playboy channel on it. I'm 
surprised you even have a regular radio, since there are still a lot 
of Stern types (without the talent) available for free. Same with TV. 
Daytime soaps are hotbeds of sex. Since people were incapable of not 
listening to Stern, I assume you're as temptable as the rest and 
shouldn't be allowed any device that might present such content. 
Remember, the same device that brought you Touched By an Angel spews 
forth tons of sinful material day after day. You should have plucked 
it out years ago in protest. I'm surprised you hold a job in an 
industry that distributes such material. Quit in protest before it's 
too late to make an impact.

Frankly, Howard is just plain bad taste. I'm not sure where to look 
in my 13 absolutely true Bibles for proof that bad taste is sinful. 
I'm sure you'll be able to find dozens. Please understand that any 
message with a Bible quote in it (other than in a religious forum) 
gets deleted, unread.

Rich