[BC] KFI Tower replacement ?

[Barry Mishkind]

At 07:26 AM 1/3/06, nakayle at gmail.com wrote
>  Well I might understand all this legal red-tape if they wanted to build
>something new- but they are only replacing a structure that has already been
>there for 57 years! (since 1948) and would still be there if it had not been
>hit by a plane flying below legal elevation limits.   If the tower was ok
>there in 2004 it should be ok there in 2005.

         There is one over-riding factor
         that should be clear, if you consider
         what has happened since 1948.

         Did you look at my KFI page?
         Do you see anything that might be a problem?