[BC] 110 V DC
DHultsman5@aol.com
DHultsman5
Mon Dec 4 12:03:56 CST 2006
In a message dated 12/4/2006 9:04:59 AM Central Standard Time,
rrsounds at aol.com writes:
The design was useful in that it reduced the parts count and cost
while increasing the risk of accidental electrocution. A worthy tradeoff. :-)
But I could be wrong.
Kind Regards,
David
***************************************************************
The main reason was the reduction of parts. No power transformer and the
filaments were series inline including the dial light. On the Hallicrafters
AC/DC s-38D receiver the dial light when you first turned the set on glowed
birghtly for about a half a second until the other tubes started to draw current.
The filament of all the tubes in series equaled 115 volts. If one filament
burned out the set wouldn't work. Like Christmas tree lights of old days.
Dave
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list