[BC] An HD Tuner for $110

Bernie Courtney jerseyspikes
Sat Dec 24 12:44:55 CST 2005


inHD has the HD coverage for the OLN produced national NHL games and they
are all in full 1080i but still look like crap.

just admit that 1080i and a puck don't mix :)

bern
On 12/24/05, Robert Meuser <Robertm at broadcast.net> wrote:
>
> This may also have something to do with bit allocation. If a station is
> running extra channels or other data, the full 1.9 megabits is not
> available to the HD stream. Most networks and affiliates are not
> offering the full bit rate. The network that does has no hockey. Even
> golf can look bad if there is not enough bandwidth.  But this is nothing
> more than if a radio station runs bad processing, they sound bad but it
> is not the fault of the technology.
>
> DTV is quite scalable, I wish our digital radio had the equivalent
> options.
>
> R
>
>
>
> Bernie Courtney wrote:
>
> >Hockey in 720p looks good, the problem is unless your team is shown on
> (and
> >you can receive) Fox Sports Net most if not all the hockey coverage is in
> >1080i, which drives me nuts with the motion artifacts as well.
> >
> >bern
> >On 12/24/05, DANA PUOPOLO <dpuopolo at usa.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Yep...Just try and watch a hockey game on HDTV - the slurring will drive
> >>you
> >>nuts! But this is the FUTURE, so it must be better - RIGHT?!
> >>Even Dish TV has artifacts by the tons now (NTSC). Whenever anything
> goes
> >>to
> >>black, what you see are a bunch of square pixels with differing amounts
> of
> >>black.
> >>
> >>So much for "digital quality".
> >>
> >>-D
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>------ Original Message ------
> >>Received: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 07:43:54 AM PST
> >>From: WFIFeng at aol.com
> >>To: broadcast at radiolists.net
> >>Subject: Re: [BC] An HD Tuner for $110
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I have also noticed significant artifacting
> >>>
> >>>
> >>on most programs, much like the effect of setting the compression too
> high
> >>when saving photos in JPG. That would drive me nuts.
> >>
> >>I guess we're not your "typical" TV watchers. Myself, I only watch about
> >>an
> >>hour or two per week. That time only increases when there is something
> >>special
> >>
> >>I want to see. My wife watches more, but still not enough to lay down
> >>those
> >>kind of bucks.
> >>
> >>Willie...
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> >>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> >>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> >>http://www.radiolists.net/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> >>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> >>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> >>http://www.radiolists.net/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> >To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> >For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>


More information about the Broadcast mailing list