[AF] Posturing lawyers

[RichardBJohnson@comcast.net]

Well it is true. I complained that the battery they sold me during the last $2,800 "annual inspection" failed to retain a charge. They claim that this implies consent to "take possession of" the airplane to check out my "assertion." One can readily see the posturing. Hopefully, the clerk hearing the case isn't as naive as the mechanics seem to think
--
Cheers,
Richard B. Johnson

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Sid Schweiger" <sid at wrko.com>
> >>They stated that they had an implied consent to
> use the airplane because I had claimed that they sold me a defective
> battery *and they needed to check this out.<<
> 
> Right then and there you should have asked for proof of your "claim."
> 
> Sid Schweiger
> IT Manager, Entercom New England
> WAAF - WEEI AM/FM - WKAF
> WMKK - WRKO - WVEI AM/FM
> 20 Guest St / 3d Floor
> Boston MA  02135-2040
> Phone: 617-779-5369
> Fax: 617-779-5379
> E-Mail: sid at wrko.com