[AF] Posturing lawyers

[Paul Smith W4KNX]

You should have filed a complaint with the FBI.
Good luck with your case

Paul Smith
Sarasota, FL

-----Original Message-----
From: af-bounces at radiolists.net [mailto:af-bounces at radiolists.net]On
Behalf Of RichardBJohnson at comcast.net
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 4:20 PM
To: The Alternate Frequency
Cc: Gary Glaenzer
Subject: Re: [AF] Posturing lawyers


Another lawyer story!

It is not just the lawyers, but also the entire judicial system.

I sued an aircraft mechanic in small-claims court. He had broken into my
airplane, used it without my permission, damaged it while using it, and then
sent me a bill for $1,200 for repairing it! This it real, I could not make
up such a story if I tried. First I tried to have him arrested because if
you did this to an automobile, it would be grand-theft ?auto. I tried three
police departments in towns that border the airport. Nobody would do
anything. Finally, I filed criminal action papers myself. The two courts
that could have jurisdiction refused to accept the complaint. They claimed
that it was a ?civil matter.? In the meantime, the mechanic filed a lien on
my aircraft because I refused to pay the bill.

Therefore, I went and ?bought? a lawyer. He said that I should sue him in
small-claims court first in an attempt to have the lien removed and the bill
marked paid. Therefore, I filed the papers, and waited seven months for the
hearing date, which was Thursday.

I arrived at the courthouse at 8:30 AM as required. Then I waited in a
courtroom, a basement area, a jury room, and then another courtroom until
1:15 pm. Then I waited for another hour for my case to be heard. My lawyer
did not show up. I stated my case, showed my documentation, then patiently
waited for the mechanic and his ?helper? to explain to the judge that they
are licensed by the Federal Government as the first line of defense against
airplanes falling out of the sky and that they needed to make the repairs or
else ground the airplane. They stated that they had an implied consent to
use the airplane because I had claimed that they sold me a defective
battery ?and they needed to check this out.

Anyway, the court sends its findings via mail, presumably to prevent
hatchet-murders from occurring in the courthouse. I think that if the court
makes a finding based upon civil law, i.e., there is something called
private property and the owner of that property is allowed to control its
use, then I will win. However, it is likely that the rogue mechanics will
win because they provided such a convincing argument, which was entirely
fabricated. We'll see --film at eleven.
--
Cheers,
Richard B. Johnson


 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Gary Glaenzer" <glaenzer at verizon.net>
> you want a lawyer story ?
>
> or several
>
> www.overlawyered.com
>
> Moody v Sears: Lawyers, $1M. Class, $2,402.
> No, not $2,402 each. The $2,402 represents the total redemption of coupons

[Snipped]

_______________________________________________
The Alternate Frequency mailing list
To post, send to: af at radiolists.net
For subscripton changes: http://lists.radiolists.net/mailman/listinfo/af