[BC] A very interesting fact behind the Apollo Mission to the Moon
RichardBJohnson at comcast.net
RichardBJohnson at comcast.net
Mon Jul 20 16:52:42 CDT 2009
Methinks that the engineers of yesteryear, have been replaced by dreamers with little intellectual honesty and less technical expertise.
Somehow the fact that the moon has been airless for a few years, allowing anything that can evaporate (like water) to have long ago gone, seems to escape the dreamers who refuse to even await the results of a moon-crash which should dislodge some debris, exposing it to analysis.
The History Channel is really the History-rewrite channel so I would take everything viewed on that propaganda source with a grain of salt --Er bottle of vodka.
Establishing a permanent base on the moon is has no scientific value (remember we have moon rocks and lots of moon dust) and little strategic value (it's hard to do precise targeting from there). If I'm going to pay for it, we get much more bang for the buck by exploring Mars.
Cheers,
Richard B. Johnson
Book: http://www.AbominableFirebug.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: BOYDSIRBOYD at aol.com
TOM,
i was watching history channel last night and there is plans for going back
to the moon.
by 2015 they want to send a basic group to the south pole of the moon and
start a base there. then by 2024 have a large encampment self sustained with
it's own power plant, water recycling, huge garden for food and recycling
co2 back into air and a working mining plant to get water out of the soil
of the moon. they had a hour long deal describing what they plan to do and
how to do it.
i guess if you live long enough you too can go to the moon.
bill
"I believe, before the [NEXT] decade is out, that Man should [RETURN] to
the Moon ..." - and establish a permanent presence there.
Luna 50 or bust!
Tom Spencer
PG-18-25453 (nee' P1-18-48841)
http://radioxtz.com/
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list