[BC] Legal ID Question

[Steve Newman]

I lived there during that time and I don't ever recall KTVU ID'ing 
themselves other than KTVU Oakland..then later KTVU Oakland-San 
Francisco...then KTVU Oakland-San Francisco-San Jose. I don't remember the 
company name insertion but then again I wasn't watching them all the time 
and could have missed it. You have to remember I went thru the 60's there. 
:)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Alexander" <dynotherm at earthlink.net>
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 2:16 PM
Subject: RE: [BC] Legal ID Question


> On 26 Aug 2006 at 13:32, Scott Fybush wrote:
>
>> It's been done!
>>
>> KTVU, channel 2 in the San Francisco Bay Area, was and is licensed to
>> Oakland. At some point in the sixties, it changed its licensee name to
>> "San Francisco-Oakland Broadcasting." The FCC didn't like it, but rules
>> are rules...
>
> So how did they get around the legal requirement for the second "Oakland"
> after the licensee name?
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Phil Alexander, CSRE, AMD
> Broadcast Engineering Services and Technology
> (a Div. of Advanced Parts Corporation)
> Ph. (317) 335-2065   FAX (317) 335-9037
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/428 - Release Date: 8/25/06
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
> Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More!
> www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/428 - Release Date: 8/25/2006
>
>