[AF] H and O as fuel

[Jerry Mathis]

I'll remain a skeptic, unless I see it for myself or it is peer reviewed. It
can't work (at least not indefinitely), unless the law of conservation of
energy has been repealed.

We saw these same type of claims with cold fusion, if anyone remembers that.
No one was ever able to duplicate the claims made by those who said they did
it.

--
Jerry Mathis



On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:55 AM, R.V.Zeigler <rzeigler at krvn.com> wrote:

> I will change the thread name a bit.
> I may be showing mass ignorance, but in reference to the H & O debate I
> have to add this. I have seen it work to power a parked vehicle. The
> gentlemen doing this research spent the bulk of their time developing the
> "gas generator". It was actually very simple and made of common hardware
> store items. They eventually were able to get the generator to draw 40 A @
> 12-14VDC. The more current drawn, the more gaseous H & O developed. The
> reason you cannot use this in conventional engines is that pure O attacks
> the cast iron and steel. To be a viable alternative it would have to be used
> in a ceramic block with stainless metal parts.
> There is a lot more peripheral information to this story that I will not
> get into in this venue, but if anyone is interested I would be happy to give
> as many details as I remember about the gas generator if they would e-mail
> me privately. These fellows were dabbling in a number of alternative energy
> fields, wind, solar, & geo-thermal. This H & O thing was kind of a fun
> sideline thing for them.
> Rod
>
> --
> R. V. Zeigler, Dir. of Eng.
> Nebraska Rural Radio Assn.
> KRVN-KTIC-KNEB
> rzeigler at krvn.com
>
>
>



-- 
Jerry Mathis